![]() ![]() By this very rule, the party’s designation must contain the information required by Md. Maryland Rule 2-504(b)(1)(B) requires a Scheduling Order to include one or more dates by which each party shall identify each person it intends to call as an expert witness at trial. No peer review report was provided or any basis of support for their conclusions. Defendant’s experts never disclosed that their opinions would include anything beyond the extent of the above statement. The proffered “opinions” of the Defendant’s experts are stated as follows: “It is anticipated that both experts will testify that it cannot be said to a reasonable degree of medical probability that the Plaintiff’s medical condition was proximately caused by the accident in question.” Id. ![]() On the day the Defendant’s designation of experts deadline, defense counsel by correspondence designated Dr. Plaintiff has not received any of the documents requested in her requests for production of documents. All notes, diagrams, photographs, x-rays or other documents prepared or reviewed by each person whom you expect to call as an expert witness at trial.The most recent resume or curriculum vitae of each expert whom you expect to call as an expert witness at trial.All documents upon which any expert witness you intend to call at trial relied upon to form an opinion.All written reports of each person whom you expect to call as an expert witness at trial.Plaintiff propounded the following request for the production of documents: Rafter is under no obligation to answer subsequent emails or phone calls related to this or any other matter.During the course of discovery, the parties have actively engaged in discovery by way of depositions, interrogatories, request for production of documents, and requests for admissions. ![]() You should speak with an attorney licensed in your state, to whom you have provided all the facts before you take steps that may impact your legal rights. There is no implied or actual attorney-client relationship arising from this education exchange. His answers to any Avvo question are rooted in general legal principles-NOT your specific state laws. Rafter is licensed to practice in the Commonwealth of Virginia and the US Federal Courts in Virginia. Neither of these two events can occur in this forum. Legal advice comes after a complete review of the facts and relevant documents and an expressed (written) agreement of representation that forms attorney-client confidentiality. DO NOT RELY ON ANY ADVICE YOU RECEIVE FROM ME OR ANY OTHER ATTORNEY IN THIS FORUM. What is happening in your case is unclear-facts are slim to none except its easy to predict the outcome of your situation as a function of your understanding of civil procedure, the law in your state, the facts, the court rules, and knowledge of the rules of evidence.Ī motion to strike is a request from one side that the judge remove all or some part of a pleading-with appropriate legal grounds provided to support the motion. Unfortunately, the issues if almost always rooted in the pro se litigant's failure to understand the law, the courts, and civil procedure. Exactly what pro se litigants say-very common.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |